Mine not me.
Usually such headings and opening lines would be a self deprecating if not journalistic attention getting misdirection. But in this case, they are a direct reference to the links which I have only briefly scanned and I simply post them for later digestion, if not comment. Their sources, and the fact that I have heard their memes through my filters, is the reason I have selected them.
By Eric Alterman * [3-15 reply]
By Isaiah J. Poole [3-16 reply]
By Rick Perlstein [3-16 reply, 3-18 Bringing it up?]
By Bob Herbert
"Freedom is not a force, but thoughts are not just memes."
[And while I pursue some off line work,
this is enough online work to pass the time:
EDUCATION
A Textbook Case of Misinformation and Bias ]
[[Not to mention this new mine field:
(email QCON 4-12-8) -
Speaking of intelligence...
leaks are hard to trickle up.
Speaking of curve balls...
remember the laffer?
Hence the hard work
and the screw ups.
Thought(?) sometimes I need footnotes for some.
intelligence -
curveball - Laffer curve -
screw ups -
Google is my post-elixir, but I often preempt the research and post the BS. (Meaning I just dug these up, but the lines were previous tangents from the whole.)
BTW: I disassociate myself from anything I have not read in these links, which is most of them. ]]
*scroll over source for titles
2 comments:
"me" Not meme, nor Dawkins, nor selfish? (editorial comment on my own editing) i.e. quotation marks are completely preemptive.
question marks the typo left, & italics edits or punctuates change
Post a Comment